We ask children what mathematicians do, and the answers include, “they do mathematics”, “they get things right”, and “they answer questions.” Hmm.
Recently in guest workshops I asked about 120 pre-service primary/elementary teachers how many see themselves as mathematicians. Each time, there were about 10% who identified as mathematicians. I then asked them, how many would like the children they teach to think of themselves as mathematicians. It was almost 100% to the affirmative. And then I ask, “Do we have a problem?”
I also introduced the idea of maths trauma, that I wrote about in a previous post, and explained that preservice elementary school teachers have been found to have the highest rate of self-identified maths trauma among undergraduate students. The heads were nodding, so I asked who would say they had maths trauma. Nearly one-third of the teachers said they felt traumatised by maths. Some came and talked to me individually after our session, and told me how their fear of maths was restricting the age group they felt they would be comfortable teaching. My message to them, is the very important message I learned from the webinar – “It is not your fault.” They have been taught maths in a way that was not suitable to them, or they many have had one terrible experience that put them off permanently. It is not their fault. And we and they need to do something about this.
Now there is quite a gap between being traumatised by maths, and perceiving oneself as a mathematician. I have, before my mathematical renaissance, been known to say that I was not a mathematician, as I saw myself as an operations researcher or statistician, rather than the abstract-focused (I believed) mathematician. I tend to think concretely, and had perceived that that excluded me from the ranks of true mathematicians. I have also written posts outlining the difference between mathematicians and statisticians (and operations researchers).
But these days, I have become a maths activist. Or maybe a maths whisperer? My mission, for the rest of my life, is to help people, and in particular, teachers, overcome their fear or dislike of mathematics and perceive themselves as mathematicians.
Education is a political act, and knowledge of maths and statistics empowers people, allows greater career choice and enables informed citizenship. (Nic Petty)
I have learned a great deal from the MTBOS or Maths Twitter Blogosphere. I hope one day to attend a Twitter Math Camp (#tmc17), but I fear I am destined always for #tmcjealousycamp where all the wannabetheres lurk. One of the best things was to find out about “Becoming the Math Teacher you wish you’d had” by Tracey Zager. The book is organised in chapters focused on what mathematicians do. We found this inspiring and have spent some more time grouping together our own, Zager’s and others’ ideas of what mathematicians do into the following structure:
Mathematicians work together and alone. Too often classroom teaching has focussed on individual endeavour, whereas many people prefer to work in groups, where we can bounce ideas around.
Mathematicians work at different paces. I recently saw a Tweet quoting Jo Boaler who said “There is a common and damaging misconception in mathematics- the idea that strong math students are fast math students.” The person tweeting added, “ It’s not always about speed.” I replied, “Actually, it is never about speed.”
Mathematicians work intuitively and methodically. Sometimes we get a hunch and it turns out to be correct, or useful. Other times we just have to grunt through some ideas and processes to find things out.
Mathematicians estimate and calculate. Sometimes we just need an answer near enough. Often we need to have an idea of the near enough answer so we can check our calculations. Sometimes we need to calculate carefully and with precision.
This set of ideas would apply to many subjects, but I have found them really useful to encourage bravery in mathematics.
Mathematicians rise to a challenge. When we visit schools with our Rich Maths events, we tell students how mathematicians rise to a challenge. Then when we outline the different activities the can choose from, we tell them that one in particular is very challenging. We have seen many children take great delight in taking on the challenge. You can see it here: Challenging activity
Mathematicians take risks. Too often students are so focussed on getting things correct that it seems too risky to try new things and push boundaries.
Mathematicians persevere. When we see students struggling with a challenging problem, it is really important as teachers to reinforce the characteristic of persevering, and not to “rescue” them. It can be very difficult to hold back, when you are bursting to help them, but short term help is no help. Encouraging them to keep persevering, and recognising what they have already done is far more beneficial.
Mathematicians make mistakes and learn. This is one of the key ideas we emphasise in our visits. It is one of the key principles in the Growth Mindset way of thinking. When we get things right all the time, there is less learning than when we make mistakes. Sometimes really interesting discoveries come from mistakes. I’d like to add a little aside here that maths teachers ALSO make mistakes and learn. If you have never had a lesson fail miserably, you are not taking enough risks!
I will address the remainder of our characteristics and behaviours of mathematicians in a later post.
Here are the five in summary form:
12 Comments
Having gone almost full circle from experimental science through pure mathematics to statistics, I was bemused by the experience of doing a PhD project that I thought of as “maths with no numbers”. I’d add to your list: mathematicians work with *patterns*. Numbers are just one sort of pattern. You can also find patterns in shapes, events, and more abstract things. Moving up and down between different levels of abstraction is what mathematicians really do, but that’s hard to explain in a few words, and patterns is where it all starts.
Absolutely! You will find “find and make patterns” in the “Mathematicians explore” group, which I will expound further in a later post.
Close Alex but perhaps too earnest: “mathematicians love patterns” would be more like it, I think. A big joy of mathematical research (for me) is of finding a hidden, quite unsuspected pattern.
So true!
I love finding links between things I thought unconnected. Although I am a maths teacher, I actually came to it quite late and still really only exploring the foot hills. But there is still something deeply satisfying to realize for yourself a new understanding of a topic or method which had previously remained hidden.
Phil Wastell
Freelancetutors.co.uk
[…] We begin by talking about what mathematicians do, drawing on the approach Tracy Zager uses in “Becoming the Math teacher you wish you had”. (I talk more about this in my post on What Mathematicians do.) […]
[…] We begin by talking about what mathematicians do, drawing on the approach Tracy Zager uses in “Becoming the Math teacher you wish you had”. (I talk more about this in my post on What Mathematicians do.) […]
I love your new additions Dr Nic. Your site will be very helpful for all math teachers, from beginning to experienced. Thank you!
Hi Yvonne
Thank you for your kind words. We really hope so.
Nic
Dr Nic continues to make sense!
The attribute I have found most useful in my career is perseverance. When an idea does not pan out as hoped, I ask what might be going on to give the result I got! It is not exactly “learning from mistakes”, but rather in-depth exploration with constant thought about what each lot of results imply. In exploration, nothing is wrong per se. Building your understanding and keeping on exploring is very powerful.
Why do you say “maths”? I’ve never heard the word “math” referred to in the plural. Is this some new nomenclature? Please respond, as this term is driving me crazy!!
Hi David
Mathematics and statistics are words that both end in “s”. In New Zealand, the UK, Australia and probably South Africa, we shorten the words to maths and stats. In North America, where I’m guessing you live, mathematics gets shortened to math, though statistics gets shortened to stats. The inconsistency is interesting. Jo Boaler, a well-known maths educator who comes from the UK but lives in California tends to use maths as well, as it gives an idea of the range of ideas. I think you will find that people in the US often do things differently from the rest of the world, such as use imperial measurement rather than the metric system which is used by almost every other country.